Wednesday, July 25, 2007

REMEMBER COMMUNISM

More than a decade after the collapse of what Roland Reagan rightly called the Evil Empire, some continue to not take the evils of communism seriously enough. According to the Black Book of Communism, this monstrous ideology killed over 100 million people. Yet for some reason, many people don’t intuitively view it as being as evil as Nazism. Stalin’s name does not arouse the same visceral loathing, the same recoiling in the face of pure evil, Hilter’s does.

British novelist Martin Amis has written a new book Koba the Dread: Laughter and the Twenty Million to increase public familiarity with Stalin’s crimes against humanity. We know nazism is evil because the images of Auschwitz and trains full of naked human beings stuffed together like sardines en route to gas chambers is written indelibly into our minds. This horrific genocidal slaughter is known as the Holocaust, but communist must murder, such as the slaughter of 20 million in the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1933 Amis alludes to in his book’s title, has no equivalent name.

Hence, when hard-right and neo-fascist political parties win a surprising number of votes, when clownish anti-Semites and figures like Vladimir Zhirinovsky gain public support, there is storm of protest throughtout the fre world as people warn of the consequences of a resurgence of fascism and Nazism. Renamed and reformed communist parties throughout Western Europe do not elicit the same reaction when they win elections; similarity, few people have expressed concern about the level of support being enjoyed by Luiz Ignacio Lula da Silva in Brazil’s upcoming presidential elections.

It is considered quaint to find college professors and intellectuals who are former communist, or who even retain some vestigial affection for Marxism. If they were former Nazis or had any lingering affinity for such noxious ideas, they certainly wouldn’t talk about it. To do so would besmirch their reputations and damage their careers.

Nazism of course, is synonymous with concentration camps and the cold-blooded murder of 6-million Jews. By contrast, communism is often thought of as communism in the theory-the writings of Marx and Engels –rather than communism in practice, the gulag and the liquidation of the Kulaks.

Amis seeks to right this wrong in his latest book, to carve a place for Soviet atrocities in the public consciousness. He notes that while Auschwitz and Belsen are well known, relatively few people have heard of Vorkuta and Solovetsky. But he doesn’t stop with describing the horrors of the Soviet police state-he dares to criticize those writers and intellectuals who defended the Soviets during those years while living in the comfort and freedom of the West. This procession of dupes and useful idiots stretches from H.G Wells andGeorge Bernard Shaw all the way through Christopher Hitchens.

I have not read more than a few excerpts of Ami’s book, so I don’t want to pretend this is a review. But his book is an occasion to remember how truly evil communism was the naivete-and in some cases, duplicity-of all the leftist who led it out as a beacon of idealism and progress.

Amazon.com cites a review of Koba the Dead from the New York Times: Amis create(s) a compelling narrative, summarizing vast amounts of information and presenting it in a lucid, accessible form.” No word on whether that review contained a denunciation of Walter Duranty, the infamous Times reporter who lied about Stalin’s man-made Ukarainian famines, claiming that “no actual starvation” was occurring and any reports to the contrary were simply “malignant propaganda “some of the worst reporting to appear in (this) newspaper” as it published favorable views of S.J Taylor’s biography Stalin’s Apologist. But Duranty is still listed in the paper’s annual honor roll of Pulitzer Prize winner.

Why was communism so attractive to so many in the free world? Why is it still not judged by the same standard as Nazism, the 20th century other totalitarian nightmare, today? ”Unlike Nazism, “Cathy Young wrote in a column about Amis’ book that appeared in the Boston Globe, “Communism claimed to champion the noble ideals of equality, fairness and brotherhood. To many well-meaning liberals and progressives, it was an expression of the enduring human hope for a good and just society; a nostalgic fondness for that hope, Amis argues, endures to this day”. Writers Joseph Sobran and Tom Bethell might be less charitable, arguing that liberalism and communism belong to the same collectivist “hive”.

Whatever the reason, it matters. Collectivist and totalitarian impulses are still strong today. While most people understand the evil that can be done when racial hatred is incited, few understand the negative consequences of class warfare. We rightly condemn genocide while turning a blind eye to equal-opportunity killers. Political persecution remains real and governments are still willing to use famine as a lethal weapon-witness Robert Mugabe’s Zimbabwe.

Lessons learned about the Third Reich will help us avoid future horrors and tragedies of that variety. But the same is true for communism, if only enough people will gain an appreciation for what a horror and tragedy it represented. And why it belongs on the ash heap of history.

Note:
To my fellow youth, please do not be fooled by those communist. Do not join the communist bandits. They only use the youth for their vested interests. Communism is evil. Look at what communism and the communist had done to Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Cambodia, etc. In Cambodia alone, almost 2 million Cambodians were murdered by the khmer rouge. Some were murdered just because they wore glasses-to the khmer rouge, a sign of education which they abhorred. Look at what the Chinese communist party did to the youth at Tiananmen Square in 1989. Communist do not have respects for life and human rights. Communist are the top human rights violators in the country. They kill, rob, burn, and destroy. They burnt schools in eastern Mindanao. They want us all to be poor so that they will have more followers. The evidence of this is their continued sabotage of peace and security. They also destroy much business equipment. Now, who suffers from these acts? The people, the same people that the communist claim to be fighting for. Killing soldiers and civilians is not revolutionary work. It is plain murder. Demanding money fro people is not taxation, it is extortion. It is only the government that has the right to tax us. And the government taxes us without a gun, unlike the communist who use the threat of a gun to rob people of their hard-earned money. These are the evils of communism. And they only form the tip of the iceberg.



Tuesday, July 10, 2007

THE TRUTH BEHIND THE CPP FRONT ORGANIZATIONS


The Continuing Deception:
“..The national united front, however, is not only for the purpose of armed struggle it is also for legal struggle…At any rate, even while there are the forces of armed revolution, there are the legal democratic forces in the Philippines. The biggest of these is BAGONG ALYANSANG MAKABAYAN OR BAYAN for short… It’s biggest component organizations are the KILUSANG MAYO UNO which is the labor center, the KILUSANG MAGBUBUKID NG PILIPINAS, GABRIELA, WOMEN’S ALLIANCE, LEAGUE OF FILIPINO STUDENTS, ALLIANCE OF CONCERNED TEACHERS, KADENA and so on.”


Jose Maria Sison – Founder and Chairman, Communist Party of the Philippines – March 1987 interview in Belgium


See the obvious connection between and among the CPP, the NPA and the front organizations! Be aware! Expose the Deception!


TO WATCH FULL VIDEO CLICK HERE youtube



Wednesday, July 4, 2007

Facile

Opinion By: Alex Magno, Philippine Star July 5, 2007

I will have to take issue with Sen. Kiko Pangilinan’s recent statement about the insurgency problems plaguing the country.

As we await the onset of the anti-terrorist law which should help make life safer for all of us, Pangilinan said that there is no military solution to the insurgencies. The insurgencies, he said, will be resolved by jobs and the alleviation of poverty.

That is a handy thing to say. It is no doubt the politically correct thing to say. But it is too facile a reading of the phenomenon of armed movements.

Therefore, it misleads rather than clarifies. It shields ruthless rebels from assuming the moral responsibility for the blood they draw and redeems groups animated by distorted ideologies from just public condemnation.

People do not rebel because they have no jobs or because they are poor.

All the literature in political science demonstrates that revolutionary movements do not evolve in societies that are stagnant. They are bred in societies that are in flux because of sweeping changes already afoot.

In societies that are stagnant, people learn to reconcile with their fate. But in societies that are in flux, old ways of doing things erode and old beliefs lose their hold on the people’s mind. In that condition, experimental ideas capture hearts and minds. Ideologies seize the imaginations of men who dare to challenge an old order that can no longer be sustained.

Hence the origin of the phrase revolutions of rising expectations. All the scientific literature demonstrate that revolutionary movements happen only when progress has caused expectations to rise, exceeding what evolving societies can realistically deliver.

The point is, rebellious movements are not symptoms of poverty. They are symptoms of the vulnerability of the poor to utopias proffered by organized, and especially armed, movements of rage. These movements offer the proposition that a violent cataclysm is the way of change. They prey on the vulnerabilities of those who have suddenly found themselves made capable of imagining another way of life by the flux of progress.

Therefore, Kiko, jobs will not solve insurgencies. In particular, jobs will not solve insurgencies formed around ideologies that condemn working in the existing arrangement, is a form of treason against some imagined revolutionary class in society.

Insurgencies do not form because people do not have jobs. They form because leaders of the insurgencies do not want jobs. Take the case of Joma Sison and his ilk who draw their subsistence from the very movements of rage they helped spawn.

Also, in the dynamic conditions of internal war caused by the presence of armed insurgencies, it is precisely those insurgencies that prevent jobs from being created and relief from being delivered to the conflict-afflicted communities. Take ARMM. Or the Bondoc peninsula. Or the islands of Samar and Masbate.

In my years as a development worker, I have seen many rural enterprises fail because of the burden of rebel extortion (or what Orwellian-speaking subversives prefer to call “revolutionary taxation). These were precisely the enterprises that might have brought relief to the poor.

I could run a seminar, for instance, on the case of Masbate. It is entirely conceivable for this province to rise quickly from the club of the 20 poorest provinces into a full-employment local economy because of the upswing in the value of coconuts and its processed derivatives. But the presence of the NPA has prevented that from happening, forcing the closure of dynamic new enterprises.

Or take the case of the Weena bus operation in Mindanao, a vulnerable target of rebel extortion because its assets roll on dark country roads. If that company eventually decides to close down rather than pay “revolutionary taxes”, that will not only inconvenience travel in Mindanao, it will also hamper economic development.

Why are our poorest provinces those infested by rebels? In part, because they were poor to begin with. But also, over time, because the presence of armed insurgents prevents the flow of investments to the localities. The insurgency is a murderous parasite that saps the life off local economies.

True, Kiko, there is no pure military solution to the insurgency. But there is, as well, no feasible solution to the insurgency problem without a military and security component.

We cannot just pander to the often unreasonable demands of insurgent groups — which we will have to do if we take out the military component. That is bad child-rearing practice, to begin with. That is also a bad way of managing a nation’s security concerns.

Appeasement never solved an insurgency. Never ever, anywhere in the world and at no instance in history.

Yet on the other hand, there are numerous cases of insurgencies terminated by a predominantly military response. Take the case of Peru and the way they wiped out the Maoist Sendero Luminoso (Shining Path) guerrilla movement.

Last month, an American actress apologized to the Peruvian people for offending them by visiting the country toting a Maoist bag. The accessory was probably procured from Shanghai Tang, a high end fashion house that peddles, not Maoism, but fashion items inspired by Red Guard paraphernalia. It does not seek to redeem the Cultural Revolution but plumb that tragic period for items of chic.

Managing national security and handling insurgencies are highly complex tasks. They involve suppressing threats to public safety without, at the same time, suppressing rights.

Let us not oversimplify the situation by dishing out facile statements about how rebels are tamed and insurgencies ended.

Read Original Articles: FACILE By: Alex Magno

Monday, July 2, 2007

Alay sa mga Ama sa Kilusan


A tribute to the fathers and comrades in the armed revolution

(Alay sa mga ama at mga kasama sa armadong pakikibaka)

Title: Alay sa mga Ama sa Kilusan
Length: 3 mins 7 secs
To watch full video click here: Alay sa mga Ama sa Kilusan